If an illustrator is paid for their work, can their name be shown when the work is published?
The obvious answer to this question might be yes - at least if the illustrator asks for their name to be shown, as part of the contract for providing the image.
Where I work, it is accepted that photographers should have their name shown next to their photograph, even if they do no ask for it. But for illustrators it is opposite: we should not show the name of the illustrator!
And the same for translators, we should not show the names of translators employed for translation jobs.
But we can show the name of the printing company that printed our publication.
I don't understand these different standards for different kinds of intellectual and technical input to a publication. All I am suggesting is that the process of intellectual production should acknowledge all sources.
As a researcher, I expect to have my name on the papers I publish, despite the fact that I am paid by contract to do the work. Why should this be different for other contributors to the process?!
What experiences do others have of this kind of mixed, inconsistent approach to acknowledging contributions?