Recently Rated:
Stats
Work interests: All my work, in one way or another, is devoted to getting across the urgent need to transform academia so that it becomes rationally devoted to helping humanity discover and achieve what is of value in life, and make progress towards as good a world as possible
Affiliation/website: University College London
Preferred contact method: Private note via Research Co-op
Preferred contact language(s): English
Contact: nicholas dot maxwell at ucl.ac.uk
Favourite publications:
Founding Member
Work: Problem 1: How can we understand our human world, embedded as it is within the physical universe, in such a way that justice is done both to the richness, meaning and value of human life on the one hand, and to what modern science tells us about the physical universe on the other hand? Problem 2: What ought to be the overall aims and methods of science, and of academic inquiry more generally, granted that the basic task is to help humanity achieve what is of value – a wiser, more civilized world – by cooperatively rational means (it being assumed that knowledge and understanding can be of value in themselves and form a part of civilized life)? The first problem includes the mind/body problem, the problem of free will and determinism, and the problem of the relationship between facts and values; it includes problems concerning the relationship between perceptual and physical properties, and problems concerning the relationship between different branches of the sciences, from physics via biology to psychology. It involves problems concerning the interpretation of the neurosciences, Darwinian theory, and modern physical theory, especially quantum theory; and it involves questions concerning scientific realism, scientific essentialism and instrumentalism. The second problem includes standard epistemological and methodological problems about scientific progress, the rationality of science, the aims and methods of natural and social science. But it goes beyond these standard issues in embracing the whole of academic inquiry - the humanities, technological research and education in addition to natural and social science - and in raising the question of how inquiry, in this broad sense, can best help people realize what is genuinely of value in life. It is very definitely not assumed that the proper intellectual aim of inquiry is knowledge.
Biographical: I have devoted much of my working life to arguing that we need to bring about a revolution in academia so that it promotes wisdom and does not just acquire knowledge. I have published five books on this theme: What’s Wrong With Science? (Bran's Head Books, 1976), From Knowledge to Wisdom (Blackwell, 1984; 2nd edition, Pentire Press, 2007), The Comprehensibility of the Universe (Oxford University Press, 1998), The Human World in the Physical Universe (Rowman and Littlefield, 2001) and Is Science Neurotic? (Imperial College Press, December 2004). I have also contributed to a number of other books, and have published numerous papers in science and philosophy journals on problems that range from consciousness to quantum theory. For nearly thirty years I taught philosophy of science at University College London, where I am now Emeritus Reader in Philosophy of Science. On 3rd February 2009 a book is to be published devoted to my work, edited by Leemon McHenry, called Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom (Ontos Verlag). My website URL, where more information about my life and work may be found, is: www.nick-maxwell.demon.co.uk
Company name
I have devoted much of my working life to arguing that we need to bring about a revolution in academia so that it seeks and promotes wisdom and does not just acquire knowledge. I have published eight books on this theme, including: From Knowledge to Wisdom (Blackwell, 1984), The Comprehensibility of the Universe (Oxford University Press, 1998), and How Universities Can Help Create a Wiser World: The Urgent Need for an Academic Revolution (Imprint Academic, 2014). For a book about my work see L....
Latest Activity
View AllI have recently published Two Great Problems of Learning: Science and Civilization, an ebook available free at https://roundedglobe.com/books/61539716-6ed9-4df5-89fa-8fdd5ec80df8/Two%20Great%20Problems%20of%20Learning:%20Science%20and%20Civilization/ .
Dear Nicholas,
Thanks for revisiting the network! Last year I visited London and other places for museum work, but could not stay long enough to organise a meeting! I did find Kew Pond though, watched swans among the cattails, and enjoyed seeing this fragment of natural world between gritty city and the manicured landscape of Kew Gardens.
Cheers, Peter (Admin., Kyoto)
Dear Nicholas,
I would like to invite you to a meetup for London area Research Cooperative members next month. Please check out ourfacebook pagefor more information and RSVP if you can make it. If you have any questions, feel free to send me a message through the co-op or via email.
Best,
Julia
Did I reply to your invitation of long ago to attend a meeting in London? I hope so. If ever you plan another meeting, do please think of inviting me.
Hi Nicholas,If you are interested in what Ken Bellamy has been up to recently, feel free to check out his web: www.kenbellamy.com.auHis latest project is the Bio-Regen Digester UnitThere is a link on his home page that explains the Bio-Regen's 3 step process of turning commercial food scraps into electricity and bio-fertiliser.Also if your are interested on his Articles & Links page is his latest article "Photosynthesis In The Dark".Kind Regards,Sharon Bellamy
Hi Nicholas,I share your views -- and perhaps have an even stronger aversion to the concept of "knowledge-based" academia from the perspective of what I see as a very brittle attempt to "own" knowledge as a means to relevence. Over the past 25 years or so, I have witnessed and can attest to a series of gross and deliberate mis-uses of the power of academia which resulted in the quashing of creativity in the name of preservation of funding for "research". Nowhere is this more evident than in Australia where all research funding is ultimately allotted in accordance with a panel presided over by academics .. who then of course favour research within their own community .... Knowledge owned is knowledge skewed in my view.Cheers,Ken Bellamy
Dear Nicolas,Thanks very much for joining, your self-introduction and bibliography.At present, the Research Cooperative appears to be of interest mainly to younger researchers and others who are still at an early stage of gaining experience and direction, and your work may be of special interest to them.Of course, there are interesting arguments to be made about the correlations or otherwise between age, uncertainty, and creativity. I am not convinced (from personal observation only) that the correlations are strong.As a goal for this Cooperative, I am aiming at the broadest possible range of membership, around the focus of research-related writing and publishing. We need to bring people with experience together with those who are looking for it, in a synergistic manner I hope.Best regards, Peter