How to write a research proposal
Editing - REQUESTS
Dear Misau,I'll try to say less!1. Regarding your (tentative?) title:Polio eradication in Nigeria: turning problem to opportunity.This sounds as if you have found the answer before studying the problem, or before you succeeded in creating opportunities.Here are two alternatives that might be suitable as working titles:"Polio in Nigeria: investigating the possibility of a happier future"Or:"Polio in Nigeria: community responses, oral history, and educational opportunities"By the way, in your country, is it possible to change the title of a thesis after it has been first accepted? The actual title of your final thesis should not be fixed until you have at least made substantial progress with the analysis and interpretation during the final writing up. At this stage you really only need a good working title that helps you explain the work you are doing to others, and that you are happy to work with.2. It is curious that (a) suspicion, alarm, and fear can spread in a community to prevent community acceptance of a procedure that is elsewhere well accepted and known to be safe, and that (b) educational information, presented in a neutral factual way, does not spread virally.i.e. Education is hard work, but alarming disinformation or misinformation or anti-information is easy. Is it true, generally, that alarming negative messages travel faster than encouraging positive messages?3. Your thesis might begin first by tracking or reviewing the history of the spread of negative views about vaccination in general and with regard to polio. What actual cases of ineffective or dangerous vaccination have been recorded in Nigeria? Such cases are possible when vaccines are weakened or destroyed by poor preparation, storage, or followup, or are contaminated with live bacteria. What actual procedures were in place to avoid such problems?4. After explaining the context as realistically as possible, try asking when, where and how were negative views first expressed, and how did they spread?This is where qualitative interviews would be needed with various players in the story - the clerics, the media, the doctors, the aid agencies, and so on. You wont be able to reach all people, but you can try to reach at least some.5. Then you might then consider presenting positive views (and what you others consider to be true views) about vaccines in different ways to a cross-section of people to gauge their responses.Is it possible to find former naysayers who respond by saying "Well, if it had been explained like that, we would never have done or said what we did!"?This might be a response you would like to hear, but you have to be careful, in your methods, not to lead people into giving you responses you want to hear (one of the number one problems with qualitative and quantitative surveys of all kinds).At each step in a project like this, you need to test your questions, rephrase them, take advice from early respondents and revise the approach and so on. Otherwise you risk making a huge but flawed effort with a one-shot survey. Surveys like this can be huge and expensive, or simple and cheap.What matters is being aware as possible of what you are doing at each step, while giving yourself chances to learn from mistakes. You need to develop approaches that work in your context, not approaches that can only work in very orderly and well-educated societies. If you do not make at least some mistakes, you will probably not learn much.6. So your theory might be something like this:"Although formal or long-term education programmes are needed for health education, faster or more popular means for communicating positive health information are also needed, and are possible in Nigeria"A classic case was the work of Mr Condom, the popular nickname of an actual man working in Thailand, and raising awareness of a simple prevention method for the transmission of AIDS. He used popular media to good effect in a country that is relatively open-minded about human desires.
To conclude:I already said too much, but...If your goal is research that has immediate practical and positive outcomes, you need a theory about how such outcomes can be achieved.The particular examples and theory I suggested above can be ignored, used, or modifed -- as you wish. I hope that I am at least making some general points that are useful for you.Peter